The download hangar is currently disabled. We're doing our best to bring it back as soon as possible.

UK Harriers package by MAIW

Post all questions and problems with official MAIW Packages for FS9 in this forum. Each package has a dedicated thread for support.
reconmercs
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 2565
Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 19:55
Version: FS9
Location: KRDU

UK Harriers package by MAIW

Post by reconmercs »

please use this thread to ask questions and to provide constructive feedback about this package here.

direct link:
http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?Ca ... LID=121241
User avatar
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167
Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Post by Javier Tapia »

NICE!


Downloading right now!
Image
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can :D
User avatar
Jumpshot724
Major
Major
Posts: 767
Joined: 16 Feb 2008, 20:20
Version: FS9
Location: New York, USA

Post by Jumpshot724 »

Great Stuff!!!!
-Joe W.

"I love the smell of jetfuel in the morning....smells like VICTORY!!"

Image
Chrisb
Major
Major
Posts: 553
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 07:34
Version: FS9
Location: UK

Post by Chrisb »

Thank you Nick. Another UK gap filled.

Chris
Keith Jones
Captain
Captain
Posts: 209
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 21:04
Version: FS9
Location: St Leonards on Sea, Sussex.

Post by Keith Jones »

I had been hoping against hope that a Harrier package would be released :D Thank you, team, very much.
Where ever you go, there you are.
User avatar
Makadocias
Captain
Captain
Posts: 385
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 09:41
Version: FS9
Location: Alkmaar, EHAM @work
Contact:

Post by Makadocias »

Once again an incredible job well done!!!

The models look top notch!

A big thank you. :D
merlin101
Major
Major
Posts: 464
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:21
Version: FS9
Location: Somerset, UK

AFD's for EGXT & EGXJ

Post by merlin101 »

Anyone done/doing these for UK2000?
Fantastic set guys by the way!
Dave
User avatar
MACC
Major
Major
Posts: 458
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 18:43
Version: FS9
Location: Elgin (EGQS)

Post by MACC »

A Model i'd been waiting for for ages, thank you for providing it nick!!
Image
Loedie
Cadet
Cadet
Posts: 7
Joined: 09 Jun 2007, 08:16
Version: FS9

Post by Loedie »

Nick great work!!.. Only have a problem the Harriers at Coningsby are flying, and Cottesmore and Wittering there is no harrier flying around!!. So what could be the problem???...

Cheers

Vincent
User avatar
Savage
Captain
Captain
Posts: 287
Joined: 15 Aug 2006, 11:01
Version: FS9
Location: EGNT

Post by Savage »

Loedie wrote:Nick great work!!.. Only have a problem the Harriers at Coningsby are flying, and Cottesmore and Wittering there is no harrier flying around!!. So what could be the problem???...

Cheers

Vincent
Our plans are done to try and reflect real military behaviour, as such there will be times where there is nothing happening. :wink:
merlin101
Major
Major
Posts: 464
Joined: 14 Sep 2006, 09:21
Version: FS9
Location: Somerset, UK

Post by merlin101 »

merlin101 wrote:Anyone done/doing these for UK2000?
Fantastic set guys by the way!
Dave
I meant the AFCAD's!!
Dave
User avatar
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167
Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Post by Javier Tapia »

Hey Merlin... I'm working on them.. Just hold a little longer.. I have a test tomorrow and haven't finished reading the books yet :?

I have EGXJ done so only EGXT remaining.... will be ready around tomorrow night or on thursday.... and if you are lucky, and I finish fast... well I'll do it today... but don't cout on that


:wink:

As alway thet tend to be as identical to MAIWs as possible so you shound't have no problems
Image
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can :D
Keith Jones
Captain
Captain
Posts: 209
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 21:04
Version: FS9
Location: St Leonards on Sea, Sussex.

Post by Keith Jones »

I've just installed this package and, as usual, I checked everything with ACA2005. This showed that there are eleven aircraft which are listed in the aircraft.txt file but not in the two aircraft folders. Would these be part of a future package, or are they just missing?

The missing aircraft are:-
AC#9, 18, 36, 44, 49, 51, 52, 56, 57, 59 and 60.
Where ever you go, there you are.
User avatar
KampfHase
Cadet
Cadet
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 16:41
Version: FSX

Post by KampfHase »

Keith Jones wrote:I've just installed this package and, as usual, I checked everything with ACA2005. This showed that there are eleven aircraft which are listed in the aircraft.txt file but not in the two aircraft folders. Would these be part of a future package, or are they just missing?

The missing aircraft are:-
AC#9, 18, 36, 44, 49, 51, 52, 56, 57, 59 and 60.
I can confirm this, as I checked them with ACA2005 myself today. There are flightplans for them, but no textures nor aircraft.cfg entries.
User avatar
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167
Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Post by Javier Tapia »

Also I think there could be a problem with the AFCAD radius.
EGXT has parkings with 8.5 and 9.2 radius for the harriers, but in EGXJ there are only parkings for 9.
In EGXJ several harriers park at the bigger parking spaces that have no codes.
Hope it helps

BTW. Once this doubt is solved, my AFDs for UK2000 will be ready
Last edited by Javier Tapia on 08 May 2008, 02:55, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can :D
User avatar
BadPvtDan
MAIW Staff
MAIW Staff
Posts: 3790
Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:14
Version: FSX
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Post by BadPvtDan »

I'm sure Nick will look at these issues when he is back. I think he is resting after all of this modeling!
"The first rule of Zombieland: Cardio. When the zombie outbreak first hit, the first to go, for obvious reasons... were the fatties."
User avatar
Greg
MAIW Admin
MAIW Admin
Posts: 4046
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 19:56
Version: MSFS
Location: Belgium

Post by Greg »

There is no problem with the parking radius Javier (parking radius = 9, aircraft radius = 8 ), but there seems to have been a misunderstanding between Nick and me concerning parking codes.

I have identified the problem and will provide an updated AFCAD for EGXJ Cottesmore as soon as practicable.

Concerning the missing aircraft (although not my area of responsibility :wink: ):
There are entries for the mentioned aircraft in the aircraft.cfg file, but opposing to what KampfHase said there are no flightplans. I'm sure Nick has a good reason for not yet providing these paints with this package. In the meanwhile the redundant entries won't give you any problems at all.

I hope this helps,

Greg
User avatar
Garysb
MAIW Developer
MAIW Developer
Posts: 2807
Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 19:33
Version: FSX
Location: Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire, UK

Post by Garysb »

I think these serials have been withdrawn from this pack for use in another package to follow

Gary
I believe that every human has a finite number of heart-beats. I don't intend to waste any of mine running around doing exercises.
Buzz Aldrin (1930 -
User avatar
Greg
MAIW Admin
MAIW Admin
Posts: 4046
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 19:56
Version: MSFS
Location: Belgium

Post by Greg »

That's what I meant with "a good reason" :lol: :wink:

Greg
mikewmac
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1787
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 10:06
Version: P3D
Location: KBTV - Vermont

Post by mikewmac »

Keith Jones wrote:I've just installed this package and, as usual, I checked everything with ACA2005. This showed that there are eleven aircraft which are listed in the aircraft.txt file but not in the two aircraft folders. Would these be part of a future package, or are they just missing?

The missing aircraft are:-
AC#9, 18, 36, 44, 49, 51, 52, 56, 57, 59 and 60.
Keith,

Gary is correct. Those 11 NBAI Harrier GR9's that were commented out of the Aircraft_MAIW_UK_Harriers.txt file plus 1 additional NBAI Harrier GR9 will be included in another MAIW package to be released at a future date.

Mike
Post Reply