Victory103 wrote:Just noticed a possible issue with the FP's, had a section from VFA-113 in my airspace and noticed they were at low altitude, around 3000' MSL, and flying from KCOF to KNLC. Checked all the FP's for the package and noticed all flights are filed to fly under 10,000'. Was this planned or is there an issue with the alt. block in the FP line, ie "032" instead of "320"?
Thats the way I did them. Feel free to alter your own set up to how you like them.
FCRO wrote:In this package the plane actually lands in a ship??
because i saw an afcad file for USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72
Not quite....The aircraft perform wave off approaches, they do not land on the ship. What you need to download to view this is all explained in the readme which comes with the NAS Lemoore V2 package. Or click the link below.
FCRO wrote:In this package the plane actually lands in a ship??
because i saw an afcad file for USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72
Not quite....The aircraft perform wave off approaches, they do not land on the ship. What you need to download to view this is all explained in the readme which comes with the NAS Lemoore V2 package. Or click the link below.
FCRO wrote:In this package the plane actually lands in a ship??
because i saw an afcad file for USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72
Not quite....The aircraft perform wave off approaches, they do not land on the ship. What you need to download to view this is all explained in the readme which comes with the NAS Lemoore V2 package. Or click the link below.
this has nothing to do with anything wrong with the package. But VFA-125 has stood down, actually last month and transitioned into VFA-122. VFA-125 will stand up again when the navy gets F-35s. I saw pictures of VFA-122 painted F/A-18Cs and had to do research on it.
do you have Sbuilder? the best way would be to create an exclude for the area which will get rid of those trees. You can also do it with ade9x but i don't know if that will interfere with the scenery
Dan
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very accurate. The bombs are guaranteed to always hit the ground"
shaggy22 wrote:do you have Sbuilder? the best way would be to create an exclude for the area which will get rid of those trees. You can also do it with ade9x but i don't know if that will interfere with the scenery
don't have either . thanks anyway ! I'll just live with the bushes . I don't want to screw anything up .
What you have there is a known FSX issue....unfortunatly for you the Lemoore package is designed and tested only for FS9. But many FSX users have been able to cut down the forest, hopefully one of the FSX users can assist you.
In FS9, an exclude will work, but not in FSX. What you need is to either use ADEX or SBuilderX to put an Airport Background polygon under those areas, marking as "Flatten Mask Class Map ExcludeAutogen". The reason for this is that the default FSX airport background polygon does not match the area of the new afcad for Lemoore.
Following Martin Grossmann's guide available over at the Owl's Nest is essential. When it comes to the excellent afcads supplied by MAIW (there for FS9) and putting them in FSX, it is potluck. Sometimes, they work great and sometimes they need some adjustments. And in some cases, I have had to redo them from scratch starting with the default FSX airport and adjusting and changing almost everything, but especially making sure I match the number and kind of parking spots ( a very long an involved process). This is because MS paid very little attention to military airfields, and also some airfields are not located the same as they were in FS9.
campbeme wrote:What you have there is a known FSX issue....unfortunatly for you the Lemoore package is designed and tested only for FS9. But many FSX users have been able to cut down the forest, hopefully one of the FSX users can assist you.
Mark
Does anyone have a fix file for? It would be greatly appreciated!
Send them to me via PM and I will incorporate them into the actual packages and reupload them for anyone who might download them in the future. I will also post them to the official support threads for those packages.
I was using ACA2005v1.6 tonight and noticed that when running "aircraft not assigned to a flightplan" 3 errors come up. They are MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164731, MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164896, and MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164897. There is no flightplans for these 3 planes?
I had this package installed for a long time, I don't know how I missed these errors until now.
Joseph29 wrote:I was using ACA2005v1.6 tonight and noticed that when running "aircraft not assigned to a flightplan" 3 errors come up. They are MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164731, MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164896, and MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164897. There is no flightplans for these 3 planes?
I had this package installed for a long time, I don't know how I missed these errors until now.
All explained in the Readme. There is no error.
Those 3 are aboard the Carrier off San Diego. The FP is an optional install.
Joseph29 wrote:I was using ACA2005v1.6 tonight and noticed that when running "aircraft not assigned to a flightplan" 3 errors come up. They are MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164731, MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164896, and MAIW_NBAI_FA18C_USN_NE_VFA-151_164897. There is no flightplans for these 3 planes?
I had this package installed for a long time, I don't know how I missed these errors until now.
All explained in the Readme. There is no error.
Those 3 are aboard the Carrier off San Diego. The FP is an optional install.
Mark
Oh ok I remember that. I was confussed cause I thought it was just to add static aircraft (I don't like static aircraft) so I didn't install that option.
