The download hangar is currently disabled. We're doing our best to bring it back as soon as possible.
AI Vulcan
Hey that's my pooch in that shot!!
-Mike G.
Recovering flight sim addict, constant lurker.
Check out my real life RV-8 build here: RV-8 Builder Log
Recovering flight sim addict, constant lurker.
Check out my real life RV-8 build here: RV-8 Builder Log
- VulcanDriver
- MAIW Staff
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 20:58
- Version: FSX
- Location: EGHH
Well if the rumours are true, that is retro as well ... again!Phantom54 wrote:Would be great if someone can make a package for just the XH558....No retro packages for me
Steve
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
- VulcanDriver
- MAIW Staff
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 20:58
- Version: FSX
- Location: EGHH
- planejunky
- Second Lieutenant
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 22:29
- Version: FS9
- Location: Suffolk, UK
I was up in Rutland last week near Cottesmore and she did about eight approaches with her gear up, absolutely beautiful she was. Sadly I've just heard tonight that she's grounded as the money's finally run out!MACC wrote:I still ain't seen it fly yet. Every opportunity ruined.Firebird wrote:Well if the rumours are true, that is retro as well ... again!Phantom54 wrote:Would be great if someone can make a package for just the XH558....No retro packages for me
- planejunky
- Second Lieutenant
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 22:29
- Version: FS9
- Location: Suffolk, UK
-
- Captain
- Posts: 209
- Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 21:04
- Version: FS9
- Location: St Leonards on Sea, Sussex.
According to the VTTS site, she'll be making an appearance at Duxford on the 5th October.planejunky wrote:Sadly I've just heard tonight that she's grounded as the money's finally run out!
Article here - http://www.tvoc.co.uk/flightoperations.asp
Where ever you go, there you are.
What I read last week there are estimating £5m a year to actually keep flying, I can't see that happening unless the RAF add it to the BBMF and that isn't going to happen.
Shame, and I would like to be proven wrong, but at least I can still remember them operating from CGY on war dispersal. The noise and spectacle of a survival scramble was something else.
Shame, and I would like to be proven wrong, but at least I can still remember them operating from CGY on war dispersal. The noise and spectacle of a survival scramble was something else.
Steve
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
- planejunky
- Second Lieutenant
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 22:29
- Version: FS9
- Location: Suffolk, UK
Sadly it was always going to be a warbird too far IMHO. The fund raising that's needed to keep B-17G Sally B in the air each year is staggering, and the Vulcan makes that look like a p!ss in the ocean financially!
It was a valiant effort (no pun intended!:lol: ) but it's all come to fruition at a time were the economy is in freefall, and any potential sponsors will now be tightening their belts. It was always very doubtful that any major company would want to attach their name to a Cold War weapon of mass destruction anyway, no matter how good she looks asthetically.
It's all very sad, but until the 1990's it was run with the financial backing of the UK taxpayer through the RAF, the operating costs are simply too expensive for a private operator, even airlines are going down the toilet due to fuel costs etc.
It was a valiant effort (no pun intended!:lol: ) but it's all come to fruition at a time were the economy is in freefall, and any potential sponsors will now be tightening their belts. It was always very doubtful that any major company would want to attach their name to a Cold War weapon of mass destruction anyway, no matter how good she looks asthetically.
It's all very sad, but until the 1990's it was run with the financial backing of the UK taxpayer through the RAF, the operating costs are simply too expensive for a private operator, even airlines are going down the toilet due to fuel costs etc.
- planejunky
- Second Lieutenant
- Posts: 34
- Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 22:29
- Version: FS9
- Location: Suffolk, UK