Military AI Works

Saw this whilst trawling...

http://defence-blog.com/aviation/first- ... tshop.html


had to give it a bash...


Jim

It looks a little bit too light...

http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=136559

Fitting in quite nicely.....

looking good.

I was not aware how big the A330 is compared to the KC-135.

Yeah. Remember that one of the reasons that it was rejected by the USAF was that it ' exceeded the requirements for the role' i.e. was too big.

What they meant was that it wasn't built by Boeing.

hawk_sh wrote: ↑02 Mar 2018, 21:34 looking good.

I was not aware how big the A330 is compared to the KC-135.

With this image you can compare KC-135, KC-46 and KC-30

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... mage01.gif

I admire anyone who has a go at painting,scenery, and especially modelling.
be sure to line the last 5 windows with the rest

f4nutter wrote: ↑03 Mar 2018, 21:10 I admire anyone who has a go at painting,scenery, and especially modelling.
be sure to line the last 5 windows with the rest

Thanks for pointing that out...in amongst all my confusion I hadn't noticed it.

Jim

Getting there...I think

Looks good!

Hi Jimroger
I think the aircraft CFG title needs to be reading "MRTT-KC-30A RR_ROSAF" to be the same as the flightplan entry.

Regards Paul Day.

Cheers...I'd changed across to ROSAF to stop confusion with RSAF (Saudi) then changed back and missed a couple of bits

Updated FP...easier option.

Jim