Military AI Works

Post support related comments for this package in this thread. The Package Manager will look into your problem as soon as possible.

NOTE 1: Keep this thread clean and post ONLY support related comments here. For all other discussions about this package, please reply to the release announcement.

NOTE 2: We will only provide support for bugs in our packages, not for conflicts with other addons in a user's highly modified simulator setup.

NOTE 3: Support for FSX users will not be offered in this thread. Instead FSX community support can be had from other users by posting questions in our "Unofficial Flight Simulator X Forums".

Just a quick heads up, the model.cfg in the model.Dual_Clean_no_Cover folder has normal=Dual_Clean_no_Cover.mdl which might cause some users trouble

Edit: Same thing with model.Single_Clean_no_Cover

Good catch on that one.

Fixed version is now uploaded.

Do people really open the model folder looking for .mdl, that's extraordinary. Could somebody enlighten me as to what problems .mdl can cause, I'm really interested to know!

fishlips wrote:Do people really open the model folder looking for .mdl, that's extraordinary. Could somebody enlighten me as to what problems .mdl can cause, I'm really interested to know!

It causes no in game problems, but does stop the models showing up in third party viewing programmes like FSrepaint. So it is ideal to remove the .mdl

Mark

It causes no in game problems, but does stop the models showing up in third party viewing programmes like FSrepaint. So it is ideal to remove the .mdl

Ok, thanks for that Mark.
Does that mean I should remove the region specific hard coded format from the model also, just kinding!

fishlips wrote:Do people really open the model folder looking for .mdl, that's extraordinary. Could somebody enlighten me as to what problems .mdl can cause, I'm really interested to know!

I don't, but as a force of habit, I run the MRAI Installer to check the integrity of my aircraft folder, and that does pick it up. Which was why I wrote it may cause problems for some users

Is there any difference between this Pensacola scenery and the one that was in the NAS Pensacola package?

Joseph29 wrote:Is there any difference between this Pensacola scenery and the one that was in the NAS Pensacola package?

the AFCAD is slightly updated in the Pensacola Texans package so if you download the other packages (NAS Pensacola & USAF T-1s, make sure you either install pensacola texans or make a copy of the afcad before you install those)

Hello Support MAIW,
I install this MAIW Pensacola Texans, i read all 100%! All other MAIW Scenery work fine, but one Pensacola NAS scenery work not, not building..! Where is other problem? See picture..!


regard
Sebastian

Have you checked to see if there are any excludes around?

Sebastian, have you checked your FS9 scenery settings to make sure that your scenery is set to at least "dense" ??

I only say this because I too had this exact same problem last week and even after all these years, had forgotten that I had turned off all of my scenery settings the previous time I had been using FS9.

Sometimes it is the most simple things that get us.

Thanks..! I found it! double scenery..!! Work fine now..!

Sebastian

Good to know Sebastian - well done.

Just spent last weekend in Pcola and drove to the flightline to check out the set up. There are now ramp shades in front of VT-4's hangar, but surprising to me the T-45 line is still not covered. On the south ramp, a row of T-6's were facing the hangars, and all Toners were under shades.

Thanks for the heads up Chris if we add more traffic there, we'll make the adjustments to the scenery as well.

Thanks I guess it's more for the scenery guy and the packs cover NAS nicely now, vice the T-39's, which will not be around much longer anyway.

Just landed with a NPA T-6A (callsign CAT650) in the pattern with me at KABY, GA real world. Cool to see the same tail number in the sim!