Page 1 of 2
Davis Monthan AFB package by MAIW
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 03:17
by reconmercs
please use this thread to ask questions and to post constructive feedback about this release here
direct link:
http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?Ca ... LID=123745
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 11:39
by RipPipPip
This is a Big Day for me as well,
I just would like to say thank you to all involved in this project.
A-10s will show up where they belong to, in the end!
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UT ... 7&t=h&z=17
Question KDMA??
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 19:34
by starlifterfan
I have another package(southwest ang) that came with a traffic bgl,the question that I have is will this interfere with the MAIW Davis-Monthan package in anyway?.
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 20:07
by Makadocias
I love this package!!
So cool all those A10's in a row....
Never knew that there were so many A10's over there!!
Thanks a lot

Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 20:26
by djnocturnal
looks great!! thank you.
Re: Question KDMA??
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 20:57
by Firebird
starlifterfan wrote:I have another package(southwest ang) that came with a traffic bgl,the question that I have is will this interfere with the MAIW Davis-Monthan package in anyway?.
Hi, I was going to answer a quick no, as there are no ANG units in the DM pack, but a quick check of the SW ANG pack Docs, just in case, confirmed this.
Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 21:53
by Victory103
Star,
Just make sure you replace the AFCAD. I've had to do this with a few of the ANG packages, I try to use the latest MAIW supplied AFCADs. You should have plenty of parking for the ANG transit Hawgs.
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 00:11
by RipPipPip
Just FYI guys -
there is Tucson Photoreal scenery (incl. Davis-Monthan AFB) by Dan Relfe (tucson_photoreal.zip) available,
looks like MAIW AFCAD is quite compatible out of the box

:

Info: Davis-Monthan (KDMA)
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 01:51
by starlifterfan
Davis-Monthan:Majcom:ACC.Host:355th FW.Mission:A-10 combat crew training;OA-10 and FAC HC-130 training and operations;EC-130H;HH-60 Pavehawk;and CSAR operations;(Major Tenants):12th Air Force(ACC);309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group(AFMC),DOD's single location for regeneration,maintenance,parts reclamation,preservation,storage,and disposal of excess DOD and government aerospace vehicles;943rd Rescue Gp.(AFRC),HH-60;55th ECG (ACC);563rd RQG (AFSOC);US Customs and Border Protection....History:activated 1927.Named for two local aviators;2nd Lt.Samuel H. Davis,killed Dec.28th 1921,and 2nd Lt.Oscar Monthan,killed March 27,1924....Area:10,633 acres...Runway:13,643 ft...Altitude:2,404 ft.......another great package by the one and only (MAIW).Just a little history of Davis-Monthan.....Great work guys.....!!!! Thank you.
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 03:08
by djnocturnal
RipPipPip wrote:Just FYI guys -
there is Tucson Photoreal scenery (incl. Davis-Montham AFB) by Dan Relfe (tucson_photoreal.zip) available,
looks like MAIW AFCAD is quite compatible out of the box

:

i have that scenery and mine is off completely on one end but the other sits pretty good. I suppose one day wehn i get the chance i could adjust it.
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 05:20
by RipPipPip
djnocturnal wrote:...I suppose one day wehn i get the chance i could adjust it.
Then I am very interested in and ask you to share this AFCAD

Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 07:25
by Joseph29
Thanks for the package. And thanks for including the airports list in the package. This help A LOT when you need to know where the planes fly so you can fix up the appropiate AFCADs.
Airport lists should be included in all MAIW packages!
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 07:41
by btaylo24
http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?Ca ... LID=123158
Does it all for you, even opens traffic files as timetables!
A Utility I use all the time!
Barry
Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 07:57
by RipPipPip
... and in the mean time "Davis Monthan AFB Complete AI Package" is a NUMBER ONE
on the "AVSIM Library - Hot Downloads for Yesterday" list

Posted: 27 Jun 2008, 19:05
by ronniegj
One of the Beta Tester's is working on an AFCAD to match up with the DM package and Tucson PhotoReal (it was looking very good the last time I saw a progress report) which matches up to a high degree of accuracy. I don't know when he will fininsh and release, and because I don't want him swamped with requests, I won't mention his name, but it would be worth while to be a little patient on this issue.
Ron
Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 01:58
by Joseph29
I just installed the C-130 part of the package and I am a little confused. Are theses E or H models? I ask because the folder says the H model but the sim= line says AI Lockheed C-130E and they are not showing up in the sim (FS9).
Also the H model has 2 model folders wing_tanks and no_wing_tanks, but the model= line is blank in the aircraft cfg.
Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 02:38
by btaylo24
Not sure what u have done, but all fine and dandy in my sim.
Can see the EC and the RQS squadron Herks parked up..
Remember these Herks are very much deployed, and not get too many of them on the ground at the same time. Did u do some sort of manual install and merge the herks?
They say E but due to issues with using the correct models we had to use the H... So not an issue, I just had to make it work as the EC models were never done by Henry...
Barry
Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 03:07
by Joseph29
Hmmm I put all the texture folders in my C-130H model folder. The first 3 lines in the aircraft cfg file look like this (the title lines are different of course)
[fltsim.xxx]
title=MAIW HTAI EC130H RCH_DM_41_73-1595
sim=AI Lockheed C-130E
model=
Now all the other planes in my C-130H folder have this something like this
[fltsim.xx]
title=MAIW_HTAI_C130H_RCH_XX_50_92-0554
sim=AI Lockheed C-130H
model=wing_tanks
What do I need to do so these planes work? Put the planes in the C-130E folder maybe?
Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 03:30
by Joseph29
Ok Im sure they are C-103E models. Because I looked at the names of the textures and they are named c130e.bmp, c130e_l.bmp and prop-hs.bmp.
Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 07:27
by Firebird
Joseph,
You are correct about them EC-130Hs being E models. It was queried early on whether the E rather than the H model was correct.
From what I remember, which may not be totally world perfect, people in the know decided that the basic E model layout was a better match to the EC bird than the basic H model.
With hindsight it might have been an idea to include a note on this for people, like myself, who prefer manual installations.
Hopefully that helps you.