Have a story, topic or report on what's really happening in the world's militaries? Talk about it here.
SMOC
Captain
Posts: 364 Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49
Post
by SMOC » 06 Apr 2008, 22:29
Pilots at Columbus Air Force Base bid farewell this week to the T-37 Tweet, in a ceremony that sent 30 of the training jets into retirement.
"It's like you're happy and sad at the same time," said retired Maj. Al Konkel, who racked up more than 4,000 flight hours in the small, jet-powered aircraft.
Rest of story:
http://www.sunherald.com/306/story/471810.html
--Chris
BadPvtDan
MAIW Staff
Posts: 3790 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:14
Version: FSX
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:
Post
by BadPvtDan » 06 Apr 2008, 23:47
That's no good...I think that was my first package!
"The first rule of Zombieland: Cardio. When the zombie outbreak first hit, the first to go, for obvious reasons... were the fatties."
MIKE JG
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 10976 Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 02:25
Version: MSFS
Post
by MIKE JG » 07 Apr 2008, 00:34
F-117s retire next week.
-Mike G.
Recovering flight sim addict, constant lurker.
Check out my real life RV-8 build here:
RV-8 Builder Log
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167 Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:
Post
by Javier Tapia » 07 Apr 2008, 00:36
What aircraft would repalce the T-37s?
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can
BadPvtDan
MAIW Staff
Posts: 3790 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:14
Version: FSX
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:
Post
by BadPvtDan » 07 Apr 2008, 00:55
T-6 Texan II....and no, there is no AI model for it.
"The first rule of Zombieland: Cardio. When the zombie outbreak first hit, the first to go, for obvious reasons... were the fatties."
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167 Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:
Post
by Javier Tapia » 07 Apr 2008, 01:02
jaja, no I wasn't going to ask that, but.. does it make sence to change jet trainers for turboprops? or there is no diference?
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can
BadPvtDan
MAIW Staff
Posts: 3790 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:14
Version: FSX
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:
Post
by BadPvtDan » 07 Apr 2008, 01:03
Huge difference. The article is a nice read.
"The first rule of Zombieland: Cardio. When the zombie outbreak first hit, the first to go, for obvious reasons... were the fatties."
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167 Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:
Post
by Javier Tapia » 07 Apr 2008, 02:59
Sorry
completelly forgot there was a link
latelly my head's been everywhere but where it should be... I'll take a look at it now
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can
Victory103
Colonel
Posts: 4073 Joined: 13 Aug 2007, 03:35
Version: P3D
Location: KPHX
Post
by Victory103 » 07 Apr 2008, 04:01
Javier,
Well, great question and I am on another forum with real world USAF instructors that have taught in both airframes. Just reading from what they say, the T-6 is the better platform, but the Tweet has was a good buy. Now if I can get my hands on one for civilian flying!
DUSTOFF
ARMY PROPS
NAVY SAR
-Chris
Javier Tapia
First Lieutenant
Posts: 167 Joined: 21 Sep 2006, 02:04
Version: FS9
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:
Post
by Javier Tapia » 07 Apr 2008, 04:34
Yes, now that I read the article I can see the differences, but if i could choose, I wold definitely fly the T-37! no doubts on that... It's sad when technology makes great planes obsolete.
Not a Member from the MAIW team, but giving my contributions whenever I can
nickblack423
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 2155 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:43
Version: FS9
Location: Ipswich, UK
Contact:
Post
by nickblack423 » 07 Apr 2008, 08:09
Same thing in the RAF in the early 90s when they replaced the Jet Provost with the turboprop Tucano.
Ive heard the Tucano is so good that it is virtually the same as the Hawk inside and handles the same...just a little slower.
Nick
"Pain Heals......Chicks Dig Scars.....Glory, Lasts Forever!!!"
Weescotty
MAIW Developer
Posts: 2787 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 22:15
Version: P3D
Location: Sydney
Post
by Weescotty » 07 Apr 2008, 12:21
BadPvtDan wrote: T-6 Texan II....and no, there is no AI model for it.
Yet
Psuls
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 476 Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:03
Version: FS9
Location: Between EBBR & EBBE
Post
by Psuls » 07 Apr 2008, 20:06
BadPvtDan wrote: That's no good...I think that was my first package!
...and my first model
NO I WON'T ERASE THE PACKAGE
Pascal
SMOC
Captain
Posts: 364 Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49
Post
by SMOC » 08 Apr 2008, 21:05
I didn't realize CB was the last base with the Tweet.
T-37s remain at Sheppard for ENJJPT... all other UPT bases have phased them out for the Texan II.
--Chris