RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

merlin101 · Post by **merlin101** » 26 Feb 2010, 15:08

Worked for me & it's fantastic!

Dave

Post by **Greg** » 26 Feb 2010, 15:34

Normally I'm a bit sad when I see one of my own AFD's being deleted, but in this case it's well worth it

Outstanding job!

nickblack423 · Post by **nickblack423** » 26 Feb 2010, 15:37

John,

I must say bravo to you and the rest of ACG. What a fantastic piece of work. Ive only looked at the FS9 version at the moment, but wow is all I can say. Absolutely fantastic. Its like being there. You have set a new bar in Scenery design and it will be a long time until anything tops that.

Nick

Post by **campbeme** » 26 Feb 2010, 15:41

Like they all said......Brilliant

Mark

Post by **f4nutter** » 26 Feb 2010, 16:42

worked fine for me too, great scenery guy's congratulations to ACG crew.

Post by **f47420** » 26 Feb 2010, 17:31

Well what can I say its great.

Just one thing can someone let me have a copy of the file AP948130 so I can get the right height for the land mesh.

As I have balls up my copy..
Mark W

Post by **campbeme** » 26 Feb 2010, 17:46

f47420 wrote:Well what can I say its great.

Just one thing can someone let me have a copy of the file AP948130 so I can get the right height for the land mesh.

As I have balls up my copy..
Mark W

PM Sent

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 27 Feb 2010, 01:33

Those screen shots reveal a scenery that must be absolutely stunning!

Looking forward to getting hold of it. Thanks!

Post by **Garysb** » 27 Feb 2010, 08:42

John
It is absolutely brilliant, I have just changed it to my default start location

Gives my Tornados a real home!

Gary

zsoltfireman · Post by **zsoltfireman** » 27 Feb 2010, 14:05

Thank you very much!

Regards,

Zsolt

Post by **gsnde** » 28 Feb 2010, 23:47

John Young wrote:May I please make a request to the authors of the Tornado GR4 AI package and to Martin at the Owl's nest who made the FSX canopy fix to do that please? To be clear, that would include the aircraft, the canopy fix and the Ranges plus the converted flight plans that I already have.

John,
I have missed that one and you did not pm me. Is this still an open question? Can you include the Tornado model?

Post by **Firebird** » 01 Mar 2010, 07:30

Martin,
John and I had some discussions about whether the model could be included or not and we concluded that it was on shaky ground.

ACG wanted to set up an FSX compilation of the for two reasons, one, being a bit more user friendly, two, to try and eliminate the 'no traffic appears at the airfield' syndrome. Which they had when they released the Twin bases package.

Trouble is the main cause of the traffic not appearing is more likely to be an FS9 traffic file in the FSX traffic system, and the re-packaging would not cure that. In the end John decided that there was a lot of pain for very little gain, so he went with trying to make it as clear as he could in the manual about the problem.
So far it seems to have been effective, however this is because members of the ACG forum have shown that they can read.

Post by **gsnde** » 01 Mar 2010, 13:46

Thanks for the info, Steve

zsoltfireman · Post by **zsoltfireman** » 01 Mar 2010, 19:13

RAF Valley

Thank you very much!

Regards,

Zsolt

Post by **John Young** » 03 Mar 2010, 22:24

Martin, thanks for your enquiry. I couldn't find the original FMAI GR4 but I found the F3 by the same author and that certainly had a licence condition that did not permit inclusion in other packages. I conclude after discussing it with Steve, that it's not unreasonable to ask users to spend a few minutes downloading the package and your canopy fix. My Marham manual contains a checklist for users with "no show AI" in FSX to work through and so far no one has raised it as an issue. As Steve says, so far they appear to be reading the manual. That has to be good news.

nickblack423 · Post by **nickblack423** » 04 Mar 2010, 06:55

John Young wrote:As Steve says, so far they appear to be reading the manual. That has to be good news.

Surely not, users never read readme's do they??

Nick

Blank Fang · Post by **Blank Fang** » 04 Mar 2010, 07:00

nickblack423 wrote:
John Young wrote:As Steve says, so far they appear to be reading the manual. That has to be good news.
Surely not, users never read readme's do they??

Nick

Manuals are for cowards!

ReadMe's are sort of manuals! LOL
-----
Willy

Post by **f47420** » 09 Mar 2010, 15:43

Guys I think I,am going mad .I have go the airfield up and running but the AI traffic is floting to high and as well as the taxiways.
But the signs and has's show up below the taxiways.

The AP948130 sayes that Marham is 22.86 meters ASL

The AFX_EGYM_FS9 sayes Airport reference point is set at 22.9m ASL

The Runway properties is set at 22.9m ASL

So what the hell I,am I doing wrong .

Mark W

Post by **Firebird** » 09 Mar 2010, 21:03

Well you have checked the obvious things. i am wondering if something is interfering. Do you have a version of NL2000 installed?

ronniegj · Post by **ronniegj** » 09 Mar 2010, 23:25

I hate to sidetrack a bit, but as the post is talking about airport elevation problems, I noted recently that FSGlobal 2010 includes a tool to correct this problem. Has anyone had occasion to try it out, and if so, was it effective? (FSGlobal 2010 is elevation mesh for both fs9 and fsx)

Ron

RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX

Re: RAF Marham FS9 and FSX