Page 1 of 1

VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 20:02
by hawk_sh

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 23:10
by Stewart Pearson

Whoops.

Got to chuckle at the list of his awards at the end of the article. I was looking for the "First in Queue at the PX" commendation star! :smt005

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 13:00
by CelticWarrior
I still chuckle at the name. I know that Yanks used to laugh over our choice of 'Nimrod' as the word has different connotations over there, along with our use of fag, for cigarette.

As does Growler, over here. Either a particularly minging pie from the NAAFI, or a particular part of a lady's anatomy. :lol:

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 13:24
by Stewart Pearson
CelticWarrior wrote:I still chuckle at the name. I know that Yanks used to laugh over our choice of 'Nimrod' as the word has different connotations over there, along with our use of fag, for cigarette.

As does Growler, over here. Either a particularly minging pie from the NAAFI, or a particular part of a lady's anatomy. :lol:
You can think of a particular pie from the NAAFI that was minging? :o

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 13:57
by CelticWarrior
Stewart Pearson wrote:You can think of a particular pie from the NAAFI that was minging? :o
Gristle in thin gravy :shock:

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 16:26
by delbydoo
Not the only one this year - seems like the U.S. Navy is taking taking no prisoners; or is it that this level of dismissals is normal and we don't regularly hear of it happening?

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/06/n ... c-firings/

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 20:00
by maddog65
No lately (the last couple of years) the Navy has been on a rampage. The military especially the Navy it seems is thining it's ranks from the lowly blue shirts (E-6 and below) to all khaki (E-7 and up) to save money. It seems every couple of months they are coming out with a different way of clearing out the ranks, to changing the physical fitness rules and getting rid of the 18 years of service safe harbor so the guy could retire, to the Perform to serve for the CPO to MCPO ranks with more than 19yrs of service.
For the officers especially the CO's you have to walk a very thin line. heck after looking over the list of CO's that got fired I guess they should have fired my first ship's CO after we hit a buoy in the approaches to the Humber River back in the mid 80's

Re: VAQ-141 CO fired on first Growler carrier deployment

Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 20:32
by delbydoo
maddog65 wrote:I guess they should have fired my first ship's CO after we hit a buoy in the approaches to the Humber River back in the mid 80's
Considering the amount of traffic that can always be found at low tide waiting to get into Grimsby and Immingham, I'm not surprised that he hit something :oops:

We're just making them redundant......no excuses except the blatant ones, just "you're out of a job" :cry: