Looking for a modeller for a very unusual scenery mdl
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
Looking for a modeller for a very unusual scenery mdl
Hi guys.
I've been playing around with Misawa AB and have a need for a piece of scenery that I KNOW has never been seen before in any FS version.
It's an antenna - ex., 40* 43' 22.39"N 14* 19' 42.57"E
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wullenweber
I grant you that it's an unusual design need, but there are roughly 24 sites in the world that could make use of this object. It's definitely large enough to be used in the real world as a visual point of reference and most are within a few miles of military airports.
I have a couple better pics if anyone is interested in taking a shot at this.
Shoot me a pm if I've peaked your interested.
I've been playing around with Misawa AB and have a need for a piece of scenery that I KNOW has never been seen before in any FS version.
It's an antenna - ex., 40* 43' 22.39"N 14* 19' 42.57"E
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wullenweber
I grant you that it's an unusual design need, but there are roughly 24 sites in the world that could make use of this object. It's definitely large enough to be used in the real world as a visual point of reference and most are within a few miles of military airports.
I have a couple better pics if anyone is interested in taking a shot at this.
Shoot me a pm if I've peaked your interested.
Why waste 'trons for a snappy signature when I can use this?
- VulcanDriver
- MAIW Staff
- Posts: 4575
- Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 20:58
- Version: FSX
- Location: EGHH
Have you seen this?
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/an-flr-9.htm
Good pics at the bottom.
RAF Chicksands is now the home of the UK Intelligence Corps.
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/an-flr-9.htm
Good pics at the bottom.
RAF Chicksands is now the home of the UK Intelligence Corps.
John
"That is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The A-bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives." - Admiral William Leahy
"That is the biggest fool thing we have ever done. The A-bomb will never go off, and I speak as an expert in explosives." - Admiral William Leahy
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
- KevinJarvis
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 920
- Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 19:13
- Version: FS9
- Location: Jacksonville, Illinois, USA, Earth
- Contact:
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
Kevin, I appreciate this.
Paul, I'm just looking for a scenery object to place. The fact that I was stationed at numerous places where these were makes their current, real world status irrelevant to me as far as FS is concerned. Call it "retro" or consider that people still fly obsolete a/c, in real life and in FS - I want to have them in my sim at various places because I want to differentiate certain areas in my si from "the default" (and "because I want them
).
Paul, I'm just looking for a scenery object to place. The fact that I was stationed at numerous places where these were makes their current, real world status irrelevant to me as far as FS is concerned. Call it "retro" or consider that people still fly obsolete a/c, in real life and in FS - I want to have them in my sim at various places because I want to differentiate certain areas in my si from "the default" (and "because I want them




Why waste 'trons for a snappy signature when I can use this?
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
No apologies necessary.
Factually, there ARE still operational non-FLR-9 "Huff-Duff's"/Wullenwebbers active in various locations both with and by non-US personnel. There are also dormant antenna installations still standing.
Obviously, you found them of interest at an earlier point. Considering that most of the FS-world is represented by default buildings - including most airport buildings, HAS's, and bridges - why should "reality", such as it is, argue against having them as FS scenery (not that anyone is specifically arguing that)?
Case in point, Hanza, Okinawa. Neither the FS9 nor the FSX landclass is accurate, either as a default or in any add-on I've evaluated. The Hanza/Torii Station antenna site was demolished and the land turned into farmland. During and immediately after WW2, that same area was an airfield, one of a few on the island. Traces of the airfield remain, but there's little to no visual evidence remaining of the antenna site. While I was on Okinawa, back in the 80's, you could see the "elephant cage" from certain spots on Kadena AFB. In FSX, what one sees flying over the site is inaccurately represented/generic farmland-mixed-with-residences. I like flying in the Okinawa area because I get great frame rates, there's a fair bit of a/c activity, and I can practice flying to some of the other islands. (Re)placing the antenna would provide "something" to that scenery area that I think is lacking. (Similar feelings, for me, occur near Imperial Beach(Ca), Winter Harbor(Maine [north of Bar Harbor]), Rota(Spain), Adak(AK), Augsburg(Germany), Edzell(Scotland) and on and on. Like I said, there are at least 24 places these could make a visual difference in a sim.).
The point being, these are unique scenery elements that present an opportunity for someone to "do something different" scenery-wise. If I had the skills, I'd have made something myself already - it's actually the primary reason I tried gmax more than once.
Factually, there ARE still operational non-FLR-9 "Huff-Duff's"/Wullenwebbers active in various locations both with and by non-US personnel. There are also dormant antenna installations still standing.
Obviously, you found them of interest at an earlier point. Considering that most of the FS-world is represented by default buildings - including most airport buildings, HAS's, and bridges - why should "reality", such as it is, argue against having them as FS scenery (not that anyone is specifically arguing that)?
Case in point, Hanza, Okinawa. Neither the FS9 nor the FSX landclass is accurate, either as a default or in any add-on I've evaluated. The Hanza/Torii Station antenna site was demolished and the land turned into farmland. During and immediately after WW2, that same area was an airfield, one of a few on the island. Traces of the airfield remain, but there's little to no visual evidence remaining of the antenna site. While I was on Okinawa, back in the 80's, you could see the "elephant cage" from certain spots on Kadena AFB. In FSX, what one sees flying over the site is inaccurately represented/generic farmland-mixed-with-residences. I like flying in the Okinawa area because I get great frame rates, there's a fair bit of a/c activity, and I can practice flying to some of the other islands. (Re)placing the antenna would provide "something" to that scenery area that I think is lacking. (Similar feelings, for me, occur near Imperial Beach(Ca), Winter Harbor(Maine [north of Bar Harbor]), Rota(Spain), Adak(AK), Augsburg(Germany), Edzell(Scotland) and on and on. Like I said, there are at least 24 places these could make a visual difference in a sim.).
The point being, these are unique scenery elements that present an opportunity for someone to "do something different" scenery-wise. If I had the skills, I'd have made something myself already - it's actually the primary reason I tried gmax more than once.
Why waste 'trons for a snappy signature when I can use this?
-
- MAIW Veteran
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 01:52
- Version: FS9
- Location: Los Angeles, California
Hi Ford, I fooled around with those a while ago when I was doing my North Island scenery. I ended up trying a photo background for that with mixed results. Here is the base model and it could me modified if think you want to risk a frame-rate hit.
- Attachments
-
- Elephant Cage.zip
- (146 KiB) Downloaded 37 times
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
John,
Hat's off to you. While that may appear to have been a "simple" and possibly "inadequate" solution for you, it is almost exactly what I was looking for.
Having been stationed at numerous "elephant cage" locations, I can say that most people don't notice the real details of the antenna's themselves [eg., actual size (diameter), # of antenna rings, # of reflector rings, building inside rings or not] on the ground. When flying, they appeared mainly due to the visual "distortion"/breaking up of the area immediately around them - and then only as one approached (there was always restricted space overhead/above them). They are/were most noticeable from low altitude (especially when silhouetted against the sky) and at something of a distance - maybe out to 5 miles - except for the large claered grassy area that was always present (being the "ground plane" for the antenna.)
What you made will definitely "suffice" for the locations I want.
Thanks a bunch!
Ford
Hat's off to you. While that may appear to have been a "simple" and possibly "inadequate" solution for you, it is almost exactly what I was looking for.
Having been stationed at numerous "elephant cage" locations, I can say that most people don't notice the real details of the antenna's themselves [eg., actual size (diameter), # of antenna rings, # of reflector rings, building inside rings or not] on the ground. When flying, they appeared mainly due to the visual "distortion"/breaking up of the area immediately around them - and then only as one approached (there was always restricted space overhead/above them). They are/were most noticeable from low altitude (especially when silhouetted against the sky) and at something of a distance - maybe out to 5 miles - except for the large claered grassy area that was always present (being the "ground plane" for the antenna.)
What you made will definitely "suffice" for the locations I want.
Thanks a bunch!
Ford
Why waste 'trons for a snappy signature when I can use this?
-
- MAIW Veteran
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 01:52
- Version: FS9
- Location: Los Angeles, California
You are quite welcome Ford. As you say, they are not all that visible and except where they are near the end of the runway, like Misawa or Elmendorf, they are largely overlooked as you climb out or concetrate on the the piano keys coming in. If you end up placing these around the world I hope you will upload your work to Avsim so everyone can enjoy it.
-
- Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Jul 2007, 22:15
- Version: FS9
Began playing with the Security Hill area at Misawa which would have looked just WRONG without the Elephant Cage.
Here're a couple shots - nothing fancy.. just "atmosphere".
Real world

Trying to duplicate that shot in FSX

Looking towards the airfield

Obviously still needs a fair bit of Instant Scenery work and quite possibly some more SbuilderX landclassing work, but it's definitely along the lines of what I was hoping for.
I have no idea if the geodesic/satellite dome.bgls made by Instant Scenery while running FSX will work in FS9. If someone wants to pm me I'll send them and the Elephant Cage.bgl I made to whomever pms me first in order to check them out.
Here're a couple shots - nothing fancy.. just "atmosphere".
Real world

Trying to duplicate that shot in FSX

Looking towards the airfield

Obviously still needs a fair bit of Instant Scenery work and quite possibly some more SbuilderX landclassing work, but it's definitely along the lines of what I was hoping for.
I have no idea if the geodesic/satellite dome.bgls made by Instant Scenery while running FSX will work in FS9. If someone wants to pm me I'll send them and the Elephant Cage.bgl I made to whomever pms me first in order to check them out.
Why waste 'trons for a snappy signature when I can use this?