Grand Forks AFB

Post and discuss what YOU are working on. This is the place to preview and/or discuss your modern day military AI projects.
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Grand Forks AFB

Post by djnocturnal »

I'm trying to put together a package for GFAFB and i was hoping someone could round up some serial numbers so i can start cranking out some repaints of the 135's, I know Graham King did a few but I'd like to do as many as possible.
I should be able to make a nice scenery as well since I know the place real well.
User avatar
SMOC
Captain
Captain
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49

Post by SMOC »

Well, the good thing is with the 911th deactivated you're down to only somewhere between 40-44 aircraft.

Your best bet is scramble and airliners.
--Chris
Image
User avatar
jetmax
Major
Major
Posts: 656
Joined: 04 Nov 2006, 20:47
Version: FS9
Location: The Gateway to the Air Force KSKF

Post by jetmax »

SMOC wrote:Well, the good thing is with the 911th deactivated you're down to only somewhere between 40-44 aircraft.

Your best bet is scramble and airliners.
The 911 is moving to Seymour Johnson and will be the Active duty conponent of the 916 ARW (AFRES). Looks like we will need to add some more KC-135s to the SJAFB Package :)
Scott "Jetmax" Jones
The Virtual Air National Guard
Ask me how to join....
http://www.flyvang.org/
User avatar
SMOC
Captain
Captain
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49

Post by SMOC »

I knew it would be reactivated this year with a reserve unit but didn't know it was SJAFB. Talk about a change of scenery.
--Chris
Image
scottr5213
Captain
Captain
Posts: 393
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 03:33
Version: FS9
Location: Atlanta Ga

Post by scottr5213 »

I will try to see what I can dig up
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

i've had no luck , can't seem to find anything on scramble without being a member.
User avatar
SMOC
Captain
Captain
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49

Post by SMOC »

Well, that's true but you can use that with conjunction of airliners and the internet as a whole to verify serials.

This took me 12 minutes to find 22 Grand Forks serials. Put some time in, you can find them.
--Chris
Image
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

well i actually have 10 now but its not as easy as others have been for me, i'm not giving up tho, i shall find them!
User avatar
f47420
MAIW Developer
MAIW Developer
Posts: 900
Joined: 29 Aug 2006, 19:03
Version: FS9
Location: Mildenhall UK

Post by f47420 »

Hope this helps

905 ARS bl
906 ARS y
911 ARS r moving to Seymour Johnson to become part of the 916 ARW
912 ARS wt

Most of the tankers at Grand Forks now carry multi colour bands on the tail

00342 KC-135T
00344 KC-135T
00345 KC-135T

all the rest are KC-135R

00321 wt
00324 m/c
00331 m/c
00332 wt
10275 m/c
10284 m/c
10295 bl
10300 m/c
14828 wt
14829 m/c
23498 y
23504 y
23520 m/c
23533 bl
23544 n/m
37976 m/c
37997 bl
37999 m/c
38025 wt
38026 y
38045 m/c
38871 y
38879 m/c
71439 bl
71440 r
71454 wt
71483 m/c
71468 n/m
71499 r
80027 y
80034 m/c
80047 m/c
80095 wt
80120 m/c
80123 m/c
91462 bl
91476 r
91482 wt
91501 m/c
91502 y
91510 r
91515 r


Mark....
User avatar
f47420
MAIW Developer
MAIW Developer
Posts: 900
Joined: 29 Aug 2006, 19:03
Version: FS9
Location: Mildenhall UK

Post by f47420 »

here's a pic of a 319ARW Tail.


Mark...


Image
User avatar
SMOC
Captain
Captain
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49

Post by SMOC »

58-0095, 59-1462 and 59-1510 are T models, not R.

Additionally, there are a few aircraft on that list that are already gone from GFAFB.
--Chris
Image
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

hey, thanks for the help! i sure do hope GF gets the new tankers whenever they decide on one. i just wanted this package to be the way i remembered it. i probably wont add any from the 911th tho.
User avatar
SMOC
Captain
Captain
Posts: 364
Joined: 26 May 2007, 12:49

Post by SMOC »

I agree it would be nice to see Grand Forks keep a flying mission. At least one worth a crap, not the UAS platforms they want up there. I can't understand why they would BRAC all the KC-135s out but bring in the KC-45s. I know there is lobbying to do so but it just doesn't make sense. If GFAFB value wasn't high enough to keep the tanker mission at this point I how could they justify it being high enough to be given the new tanker?
--Chris
Image
Cowboymarine1593
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
Posts: 93
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 06:59
Version: FS9
Location: KBOI usa

Post by Cowboymarine1593 »

im stationed at grand forks, if you need help with what we have right now assigned let me know, we are number one on the list to get the new tanker as a test base for the one chose which right now the air force is leaning toward the 767 due to air bus not providing us with a actual tanker to test right now when boeing has provided a full working tanker to test. and for the record the grand forks ribbon across the top of the tails of our birds are all black and white, and we have one bird with our mascot on the nose
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

Cowboymarine1593 wrote:im stationed at grand forks, if you need help with what we have right now assigned let me know, we are number one on the list to get the new tanker as a test base for the one chose which right now the air force is leaning toward the 767 due to air bus not providing us with a actual tanker to test right now when boeing has provided a full working tanker to test. and for the record the grand forks ribbon across the top of the tails of our birds are all black and white, and we have one bird with our mascot on the nose
hey, if you can and don't mind pm me whats there. I used to be stationed there as well but left in 2003 for keflavik, and am now at holloman. I hope they get the new tankers, I grew up there as a kid also when my dad was a crew chief there and they had the B-1's. I would hate to see it have the UAV's.
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

i now have 26 numbers that were confirmed at GF between 2006 & present. the only problem i'm having is finding out if they were with the 911th, 912th, 905th, or the 906th they all seem to have the same tail markings and that makes it even harder. so maybe i'll just make it one big 319th ARW and not designate by squadron... :?
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

a screenie, i'm not sure if i'm going to keep the little sun/snowflake logo on the tail, every picture of seen so far of 6 different jets had it, i think it makes the tail look a little beter than just a plain white tail.
Image
User avatar
Jumpshot724
Major
Major
Posts: 767
Joined: 16 Feb 2008, 20:20
Version: FS9
Location: New York, USA

Post by Jumpshot724 »

My vote is to leave it in :D
-Joe W.

"I love the smell of jetfuel in the morning....smells like VICTORY!!"

Image
Cowboymarine1593
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
Posts: 93
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 06:59
Version: FS9
Location: KBOI usa

Post by Cowboymarine1593 »

the sun and snowflake emblem is under the window on the pilot side, and that i know of all of the a/c are just wing assigned, i mean when im on g2 one a/c will have 905 crew for one mission and then 912 for the next, and the three squadrons here are the 905, 906 and 912. ill do my best to see if one of my boom buddies knows more than me on the squadron split of the 35 a/c assigned here
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

Cowboymarine1593 wrote:the sun and snowflake emblem is under the window on the pilot side, and that i know of all of the a/c are just wing assigned, i mean when im on g2 one a/c will have 905 crew for one mission and then 912 for the next, and the three squadrons here are the 905, 906 and 912. ill do my best to see if one of my boom buddies knows more than me on the squadron split of the 35 a/c assigned here
so did they strip that logo from the tail? i have six pictures of six different jets and they are all on there as of 07...so sometime after 07 they removed them? I still may leave em as this is going to be a sort of retro package anyways. 319th ARW it is!! you guys can load your imaginary squadrons as you wish :)
Post Reply