The Peter Principle-F-22

Have a story, topic or report on what's really happening in the world's militaries? Talk about it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
GZR_Sactargets
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 984
Joined: 23 Aug 2006, 19:20
Version: FS9
Location: PAPILLION, NEBRASKA(Near OFFUTT AFB-KOFF)

The Peter Principle-F-22

Post by GZR_Sactargets »

There was a book called the "Peter Principle." The principle idea was that people wouild advance until they reached their level of incompetence. Looks like this guy embodies that principle. The arguments against the F-22 are specious and short-sighted. However that is often the case when an academic rises in the political and/or media. I guess the re-activation of the Russian flights on US targets is irrelevant too. :twisted:

Pouncing on the Bird of Prey: Guess what, folks? As if we haven't heard this point of view ad nauseum before: the F-22 isn't needed and continues to be an immense waste of money because al Qaeda and the Taliban have no air forces. So argue Raptor critics Pierre Sprey, James Stevenson, and Winslow Wheeler in the op-ed pieceThe F-22: expensive, irrelevant and counterproductive that appeared Jan. 27 in the Star-Telegram. Indeed, the F-22's primary mission of shooting down enemy aircraft "has no meaning in 21st-century warfare," write Spree, a former Pentagon official who helped design the F-16, and his two colleagues. They believe that, even in the hypothetical event that an opponent did arise to threaten air supremacy, the Raptor, which they term "a huge disappointment," likely would make disbelievers of us all. Oddly, that is not the sentiment expressed by the pilots who fly them and the forces they've met in mock combat. If interested, you can read the rest of their argument for yourself. There are some outside the Air Force that believe purchasing more F-22s is a sound decision, particularly given the state of the F-15 force. And, potential adversaries like the Chinese don't seem to be banking on 1970s technology to win their next wars, but instead are investing in modern fighters, some considered to be on par with the best of the US fourth-generation fighters.

http://www.star-telegram.com/245/story/434931.html Op.ed piece

http://206.204.189.217/AFA/Reports/2007 ... stment.htm Short counter argument

http://206.204.189.217/AFA/Reports/2007 ... 0china.htm
The China reference


From AF Daily Report-31 Jan 08
GZR_SACTARGETS
djnocturnal
MAIW Veteran
MAIW Veteran
Posts: 1376
Joined: 26 Jun 2007, 02:22
Version: P3D
Location: KRDR

Post by djnocturnal »

wow...well there are other countrys with aircraft...i'm sure they aren't buying this many raptors to scare terrorists :roll:
Post Reply