Has anyone got any Saudi Air Force AI's

DaleRFU · Post by **DaleRFU** » 12 Apr 2009, 08:56

now then.. has anyone got any Saudi AIr Force AI's that are realistic and NOT maiw as i already have them?

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 13:14

What do you call realistic?

Gary

MIKE JG · Post by **MIKE JG** » 12 Apr 2009, 14:08

This should be good.

Firebird · Post by **Firebird** » 12 Apr 2009, 15:28

LOL, I am pulling up a chair and going to watch this. Wanna beer, Mike?

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 12 Apr 2009, 15:44

I read it with a different emphasis though: I don't think DaleRFU is saying that the MAIW plans are not realistic - though it might look like that at first! I think he just wants some additional plans that match the same high standard....is that right, Dale?

As for realistic, I never mention the "r" word

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 16:11

We don't take any c**P us Scunny Bunnies

Cant afford too

I just hope it was something lost in the translation

(Takes coat off and warms up )

Gary

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 16:18

kungfuman wrote:

I read it with a different emphasis though: I don't think DaleRFU is saying that the MAIW plans are not realistic - though it might look like that at first! I think he just wants some additional plans that match the same high standard....is that right, Dale?

As for realistic, I never mention the "r" word

A born diplomat

Firebird · Post by **Firebird** » 12 Apr 2009, 17:01

Garysb wrote:A born diplomat

I didn't think they were born

, I thought they were created with the use of electric shock treatment and nicotine injections.

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 12 Apr 2009, 17:36

So thats what happened that dark night...

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 18:28

I'm away on holiday for a week from tomorrow so someone will have to fight my corner if I'm not here

Gary

DaleRFU · Post by **DaleRFU** » 12 Apr 2009, 19:07

no no the MAIW plans are realistic as hell they are fantastic please am not saying they are not. i just woundered if there was any PC-9 or F-5 ones. i mean realistic so that they are based at the correct airfeilds. like before MAIW came about there was a download on avsim for the awac and they based it at OERY for some reason. thats what i mean

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 20:36

You are forgiven
(Puts coat back on

)

We were trying to find out about the PC9 not much info though.
I have made allowance at OERY in the AFCAD.

We have the C-130s nearly ready and I did have plans for the F-5's now we have a model but that will be in the future as we have other things in the works.

Cheers

Gary

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 12 Apr 2009, 22:26

Sorry, did my diplomacy spoil the prospect of a good fight?

Well maybe I have a bone to pick....

MAIW Warton afcad: who dunnit.

Was it YOU?

I need to have some words if it was

Garysb · Post by **Garysb** » 12 Apr 2009, 23:40

No

Off on my Hols now

(Runs and hides)

Gary

DaleRFU · Post by **DaleRFU** » 13 Apr 2009, 06:24

if you like i could help you with the PC-9 one. i can give you numbers of aircraft exact and i can tell you what sort of plans they are flying to aswell? i will be looking forward to seeing them in the future then. thanks. sorry if it seemed like i was dissing your work

Firebird · Post by **Firebird** » 13 Apr 2009, 10:36

kungfuman wrote:Sorry, did my diplomacy spoil the prospect of a good fight?

Well maybe I have a bone to pick....

MAIW Warton afcad: who dunnit.

Was it YOU?

I need to have some words if it was

So after stopping a fight, you now want to start one

?
What is it that you take issue with? I am taking it that you are talking about an MAIW one.

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 13 Apr 2009, 16:43

Now we're onto a new page, I will stop my posturing.

I am interested in releasing an EGNO afcad update that includes parking for my Nimrod flightplans. By referencing the googlemaps aerial image of Warton, in conjunction with the uk aip, I have brought the MAIW Afcad "up to speed."
My problem is simply that I cannot identify who the original was by, although I think I have narrowed it down to possibly Gary Barker or Duncan Mackenzie (I renamed the original afcad, which probably contained a clue). This is why I threw a speculative jab at "garysb".

Obviously, it would be wrong to upload something that is not all my own work, and I also want to have the original authors blessing - whether they wish to be credited as co-author, or indeed sole author (if I just hand everything over to them for further development/improvement).

I have no bone to pick - I was just communicating in the fighting talk appropriate to the previous page.

petebramley · Post by **petebramley** » 13 Apr 2009, 16:49

Hi All#

just looked at my copy of egno and it appears to be by Duncan Mackenzie

Filename: EGNO_DEFAULT_DM_MAIW.bgl

Rgds

Pete

BadPvtDan · Post by **BadPvtDan** » 13 Apr 2009, 17:46

On a similair note, if you get Duncans permission to repost...make sure you take out the MAIW part in the name.

kungfuman · Post by **kungfuman** » 13 Apr 2009, 20:07

Wilco.

And thanks for that info Pete.