Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post all questions and problems with official MAIW Packages for FS9 in this forum. Each package has a dedicated thread for support.
User avatar
campbeme
MAIW Staff
MAIW Staff
Posts: 3293
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 11:58
Version: FSX

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by campbeme »

Joecoastie wrote:I was flying around in my FAA Flight Check bird doing some missed approaches at Hurlburt Field when I noticed a C-130 lining up for landing. Looked like he needed to declare an emergency. :shock: Fire streaming out behind. He calmly made a touch & go still streaming flames.
I landed and took two pics on his next go around. There was another 130 shooting T&G at the same time and it did not display any flames.

Image

Image

Is this an .fx file that caught fire :lol: or is it something you all had added on purpose? :?:
Or is it because I haven't deleted it (Leopard 1308) and let him go to New Mexico?

Hey Joe,

No thats a common fault with that model during Dusk Dawn and Night. There is no fix that I know of.

Mark
Mark
User avatar
Firebird
MAIW Admin
MAIW Admin
Posts: 12137
Joined: 11 Aug 2006, 21:04
Version: FS9
Location: EGLL

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by Firebird »

A well known side effect of the smoke effect for it. It happens at dusk, and dawn I think. You will probably find that the other C-130 didn't have the smoke effect.
Steve
_______________________________________________________
Image
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
User avatar
starlifterfan
Captain
Captain
Posts: 227
Joined: 07 Apr 2008, 12:42
Version: FS9
Location: Near KCOF

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by starlifterfan »

I remember flying around Gander and seeing one of these flame throwing 130's , the pic there looks like a JATO . Dusk and dawn it does show.
User avatar
Joecoastie
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 860
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 17:46
Version: P3D
Location: 8.2mi/077 radial of GVE

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by Joecoastie »

Ah! Can one delete the .fx file to "fix" the side effect?
Or just not look at these 130's around dawn & dusk?

:? What happens if I ignore them and one has a "real fire emergency"? A dilemma! :smt005
Service to my Country 9/61 - 2/03
US Navy - HS-3, VX-1, HS-7 (USS Intrepid, USS Wasp, USS Yorktown)
Va National Guard - 229th Cbt Avn Co
US Coast Guard - E City CGAS, CGC Morro Bay, RTC Yorktown
NOAA - Co-op Observer 1983 - present
User avatar
Victory103
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 3978
Joined: 13 Aug 2007, 03:35
Version: P3D
Location: KPHX

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by Victory103 »

Agree with Joe, you can just switch out the smoke .fx, try the smoke from the E-3 package, not as bad but not as realistic as the C-130's look short final, full flaps and those nice smoke trails.
DUSTOFF
ARMY PROPS
NAVY SAR

-Chris
flyerkg
Major
Major
Posts: 403
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 05:42
Version: P3D

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by flyerkg »

Yep, I would sooner swap the smoke effect before completely removing smoke from the C-130. It would take away too much realism to not have the smoke.

Keith
User avatar
MIKE JG
MAIW Developer
MAIW Developer
Posts: 10976
Joined: 12 Aug 2006, 02:25
Version: MSFS

Re: Hurlburt Field package by MAIW

Post by MIKE JG »

There was a chap over at the AIG forums that claims that his system does not suffer this effect. Search for that thread over there, might have something useful in it.
-Mike G.

Recovering flight sim addict, constant lurker.

Check out my real life RV-8 build here: RV-8 Builder Log
Post Reply