It was mentioned at the beginning of page 2.

What I am going to show here is the new F-5E model. Before we start a couple of rules. Lets keep the Gee Wizz, Great, Can’t Wait comments down. Do not ask about packages or release dates, what I said earlier still stands. No requests for paints, packages or model variations. Awww come on guys, you ...

Is that the version that has those bloomin' gas pumps in the way on the taxiway turnings?

Its the bloody cleaning woman, that will insist on swiching off my PC every night.

MIKE JG wrote:Ahh yes, thanks, I see a Version 3 coming soon........

More of a v2.1, surely.

Menno,
Of course you could always include the 17th RW aircraft as well, as they were there at the same time as the 10th TFW.

The instructions to remove the v1 package files are complete and are aimed at users that are not too sure what they are working with and should be carried out with impunity BEFORE upgrading. However,if you have already installed the new package, it would not be ideal to remove them because as you so...

Typical isn't it, we spend so much time testing this and as soon as we release it a bug surfaces.
If you find that the C-17 paratroopers don't work then you will need to use slightly modded one attached here.

Please note this is for the MAIW_PAI_C17_RPP_Elmendorf AFB_Para folder ONLY

felix,
Purely by chance I checked the Beale scenery first and neither the JGSE nor GGSE libs are required for that scenery, so if you have blank vehicles there its probably a problem with your mcdmil installation.

Maybe download that one again and re-install it.

I can't believe that I am going to attempt to answer a question on painting, but here goes. From my limited understanding, i.e. I can't paint or use a paint package, what you need to do is work with first generation 24 bit paint schemes. You then add your codes, sqn markings etc and save the result ...

It does sound to me like a bug in the latest drivers for your card. Try using the oldest vista version driver available for that card and seeing if the problem exists back them. If it does then you will have to try switching some of the graphics variables, using something like nHancer. I know that I...

Ford, don't apologize for the day of the week! We know that its completely outside your control, mate .

Yeah but they don't look as cool.

I have had a look at the old plans, as Dan said, and saw that of the 5 schemes for NC ANG, one is used 3x, three are used 2x and one, 93-1458, is not used at all. Now it would seem that the best way to fix this yourself is to decompile the plans into their three txt files, amend the aircraft txt fil...

foufure, I remembered that there was an error in the Alphasim B52 AI fde, I did a search and found that the following line needs to be amended in the aircraft.cfg :- empty_weight_CG_position = -12, 0, 0 // (feet) longitudinal, lateral, vertical distance from specified datum to empty_weight_CG_positi...

It definitely looks interesting, Martin. I shall have a play with it, when I get some time.

Sorry, but I can't help on this one. I don't have it installed.

Hi there,
Yes I noticed them, very much appreciated.

OK it works for me, and I think I know what the problem is. You identified the field that caused you the problem, "Maximum range in nm or leg duration in min or h" but I think that you may not have added the 'nm' after the 430. The field needs either 'nm', 'min' or 'h' for its calcs. A num...

I think that it comes with the payware package, a sort of bonus.