Came across this over at Fighter Control, it's the Dash 8 pic I'm interested in; apparently it's operated either by or on behalf of the 27th SOW based out of Cannon AFB; Wikipedia says that the wing have distributed aircraft and personnel globally to fight the war on terror. Just wondering if it's a regular-ish visitor or based at Mildenhall.......maybe repaint time....
http://fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewt ... 16&t=30247
Cheers
Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
- Victory103
- Colonel
- Posts: 3978
- Joined: 13 Aug 2007, 03:35
- Version: P3D
- Location: KPHX
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
Pretty sure all based at Cannon AFB, NM, I saw one up at KFCS getting gas (didn't get the tail #). Agree about repaint time, AFSOC have several commercial airframes that could use repaints, see the M-28 thread.
DUSTOFF
ARMY PROPS
NAVY SAR
-Chris
ARMY PROPS
NAVY SAR
-Chris
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
That arrived last week the sameday as the three M28's, then they all went to Ramstien. Only the DHC-8 comeback to the Hall.delbydoo wrote:Came across this over at Fighter Control, it's the Dash 8 pic I'm interested in; apparently it's operated either by or on behalf of the 27th SOW based out of Cannon AFB; Wikipedia says that the wing have distributed aircraft and personnel globally to fight the war on terror. Just wondering if it's a regular-ish visitor or based at Mildenhall.......maybe repaint time....
http://fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewt ... 16&t=30247
Cheers
Mark
Mark
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
Another interesting picture on that thread was the KC with the two pods. I heard that the capability was part of an upgrade but I haven't seen an operational flight.
I was thinking about asking Graham how long it would take to knock up 300+ schemes for the KE-3A model! Then I thought better of it.
I was thinking about asking Graham how long it would take to knock up 300+ schemes for the KE-3A model! Then I thought better of it.
Steve
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
But at least they would be GREY......Firebird wrote: I was thinking about asking Graham how long it would take to knock up 300+ schemes for the KE-3A model! Then I thought better of it.
-
- Major
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 10 Sep 2009, 18:50
- Version: FS9
- Location: KMEI
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
The two pods on the KC-135 are for the MPRS. The multipoint refueling system, been around for about ten years, and I think the French have had it on their's for a few years before that. If you know anyone stationed on a little island in the Med that has an RAF base on it, say around 2003, the Navy and Marines were pretty regularly removing the drogue with their probes. And officially no US aircraft are stationed there.
Bazinga!
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
They should get some bloomin' training then.phantomfreak wrote:... the Navy and Marines were pretty regularly removing the drogue with their probes.
Steve
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
Quid Si Coelum Ruat
_______________________________________________________
-
- Major
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 10 Sep 2009, 18:50
- Version: FS9
- Location: KMEI
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
I reckon the adrenaline was pumpin' at the time.
Bazinga!
- garysted
- First Lieutenant
- Posts: 126
- Joined: 04 Feb 2007, 12:39
- Version: FS9
- Location: Stowmarket, Suffolk
Re: Regular unidentified vistor at the Hall
Hi Gents,
The 100th ARW at Mildenhall has had one or two '135's with MPRS for years now. I don't know how accurate but I did hear that despite having them - which makes sense considering that the 100th is the tanker unit in the most likely place to use them - the 100th had not got any crews qualified on the fit. That was a while ago, but still years after they recieved MPRS configured '135's.
Gary
The 100th ARW at Mildenhall has had one or two '135's with MPRS for years now. I don't know how accurate but I did hear that despite having them - which makes sense considering that the 100th is the tanker unit in the most likely place to use them - the 100th had not got any crews qualified on the fit. That was a while ago, but still years after they recieved MPRS configured '135's.
Gary